Navigating Project Management Methodologies: Agile vs Waterfall Showdown
Agile vs Waterfall Showdown


Hi! Welcome back again to my blog. Past adopters of
agile project development
were small, self-possessed teams performing on small, self-contained tasks or
projects. They proved that the agile model can execute, to the progress of
software builds across the globe. It turned out the model of waterfall project
management wasn’t as better for the software development as
agile project management
was for many teams.

Now these days, most of the organizations have started scaling agile beyond
one team or project and have started implementing it on entire programs
because of famousness of agile project management. However, Agile has even
spread among several development teams to include IT, business development,
marketing, and more.

Agile vs waterfall project management

Initially, Agile was included by software teams, who shifted from the
traditional,  waterfall method to an advanced method that provided
regular feedback and management at the time of development lifecycle.

project management
has taken an iterative method for development by making several progressing
steps with frequent feedback intervals.

This encourages adaptability as a team can manage throughout the process of
product development, rather than getting confined through a linear way. It
also grants for regular, high-influence output that helps teams to render a
series of wins over period.

About agile project management

Agile project management can be defined as an iterative method to develop a
project, which needs frequent releases that include customer comment. The
capability to manage during every iteration promotes the velocity and
adaptability. This method is different from a simple ‘waterfall project
management’ method, which follows a set way with certain deviation.

With modern age customers and businesses desiring quick responses and
alterations, agile renders the flexibility to manage and iterate at the time
of the development procedure. Also, Agile project management is considered as
a cornerstone of
DevOps programs, where operations and development teams perform together.

Principles of Agile

  • An agile project is divided into multiple progressing steps that
    include frequent feedback intervals.
  • A project need is divided into smaller portions, which are then emphasized
    by importance.
  • It adjusts at regular pre-decided intervals to make sure a customer’s desire
    are fulfilled.
  • It helps in collaboration, especially with the client.
  • It combines planning with running, which permits a team to effectively
    answer to modifying needs.

Benefits of Agile management

  • Detects issues early
  • Quicker feedback cycles.
  • Greater potential for satisfaction of customer.
  • Efficient teams perform better within a given time.
  • Time to market is certainly enhanced.
  • More visibility / beneficial.
  • Flexible importance targeted on result delivery.

Disadvantages of Agile

  • Perfect agile running with a regular deployment pipeline has several
    technical component & engineering costs for establishment.
  • Difficult path and inter-project dependencies might not be defined with
    clarity as in waterfall.
  • An organizational study curve cost is available.

Elements to include while shifting to agile

Shifting to agile can be valuable, especially while a team or organization is
shifted from an older traditional project management method. Shifting to agile
practices might need a number of procedure modifications, especially while
including a
DevOps method, where both development & operations teams perform together to build and
maintain software. While including agile principles, a team and the client
must accept following two significant concepts:

  • Usually, the development team will only accept task that it has the
    capability for. The product owner never tends to push work to the team or
    make commitment to them to particular deadlines. However, the development
    team catches task from the program’s backlog as it can have new task.
  • Mainly, the client’s target is to maximize the value of the team’s result.
    The team depends on the client’s need to accomplish the most significant
    task first.

About waterfall project management

The waterfall project management method entails a perfectly explained sequence
of running with project phases that never progress until a phase gets final
permission. Once a phase is accomplished, it can be tough and costly to
revisit a previous position.
Agile teams
might follow a same sequence yet do so in smaller increments with regular
feedback loops.

A single crossed deadline or scope modification at the time of a waterfall
project can cause outsized influence on frequent releases. Also, when a team
focuses on the next phase of assignment completely, clearing technical issues
or fixing bugs can be pain taking if the team is completely allocated to new
type work and often pushing forward to the next level.

The waterfall management method for a project follows a linear, sequential
policy. It performs well for task that has expectable, recurring processes,
yet it can leave development teams flat-footed and unable to adjust quicker
than a competitor.

An example of a waterfall project with tightly partitioned blocks of time.
This makes a “utilise it or lose it” thought that inspire developers, owners
of product, and stakeholders to request in every time window, since there
might be no chance to iterate in the upcoming time. Generally, teams utilizing
waterfall try to handle scope creep through “edit control”, where everyone
agrees the main contract is not modified.

The waterfall model can release some of the famous challenges of developing

  • Difficulty in obtaining user feedback and product checking: To include
    harassment to injury, the end customer will be unable to interact with the
    product until it’s completed. Thus, crucial issues in design of product and
    code keep secrete till the time of release.
  • Blockers and dependency management: Traditional project management styles
    often make “complex paths”, where the project can’t proceed ahead until a
    blocking problem is resolved.

Benefits of waterfall

  • The cost of the project can be calculated after the needs are explained.
  • It needs less coordination because of the correctly explained phases
    sequential procedures.
  • A clear project phase assists to explain dependencies of work clearly.
  • Better concentration on documentation of designs and needs.
  • The design phase is more procedural and designed before any software is

Drawbacks of waterfall

  • It’s tougher to break up and share task because of specialized tighter phase
    teams sequentially.
  • Risk of wasting time due to late and setbacks throughout phase transitions.
  • Additional communication overhead at the time of handoff throughout phase
  • We need to hire more employees to accomplish special phase teams and on the
    other hand agile influences combination of multiple cross-functional team.
  • Product ownership and involvement might not be as strong in comparison to
    agile since the target is shifted to the existing phase.

Let’s go through the mechanisms agile projects utilize to organize, execute,
and structure task in an iterative method.

Iterative method provides various benefits for a team to:

  • It collects feedback from clients during the procedure and iterate
    appropriately without the pressure of a final handover deadline.
  • We adapt iterative method to modifying situation from newly found needs to a
    blocked portion of work.
  • We develop relationships and different connections across various roles that
    make it smoother for people to get connected and communicated perfectly.

Agile enables teams to be more efficient to changes that certainly happen at
the time of a project.

An even better advantage of the shared skill among the software development
teams could be realized. The team’s abundant skill sets add more flexibility
to the task in all portions of the team’s codebase. Hence, this method,
performance and time aren’t wasted at all if the project direction alters.

Product Roadmaps

A product roadmap displays how a product or solution gets developed over a
specific time. A roadmap in agile management provides significant context that
helps teams to reach both progressive and project-wide targets. Roadmaps are
designed of start-ups that are large regions of functionality, and include
given timelines that connect when a feature is available. As the work is
progressed and teams learn more, it’s realized that the roadmap will alter to
reflect that the newer information – probably in broad methods. The target is
to keep the roadmap concentrated on existing conditions that influence the
project and long-term targets in order to  work efficiently with clients
and answer to the challenging landscape.

The following is a genuin roadmap for a product development team, with starts
in the boxes and timelines referred by the milestone-highlighters in red.


Each beginning in the roadmap breaks down into a special set of needs. Agile
needs are smooth explanation of desired features, rather than the several-page
documents connected with traditional projects. However, they exclude over time
and capitalize on the team’s shared knowledge of the client and the desired

Agile needs stay lean while each of the team builds a shared understanding
through current conversation and combination. While implementation is suppose
to start are they fleshed out with complete details.


The backlog sets the importance for the agile project. The team involves all
task items in the backlog: new advantages, bugs, improvements, technical or
architectural assignments, etc. The client gives priority the task on the
backlog for the team of engineering. The development team utilizes the
important backlog as its single truth source for what task desires to be

Agile metrics

Agile teams thrive on metrics. WIP(Work In progress) limits make the team, and
business, concentrate on providing the best urgent work. Various graphs such
as burndown charts and management charts assist the team expect their delivery
cadence, and progression flow diagrams assist detect bottlenecks. These agile
metrics and artifacts make everyone concentrated on the great goals and
improvement confidence in the team’s capability to provide future work.

Agile runs on trust

Agile processes are unable to function without a high level of trust amongst
team members and therefore make trust. It needs specialist to have critical
conversations regarding selecting correct option for the specific program and
the product. Because conversations occur at regular intervals, plans and
concerns are regularly stated. That means team members should be confident in
each other’s capability (and interest) to perform on the decisions made
throughout those conversations.


Hope, you must have got better idea on difference between Agile and waterfall
project management. Agile is an innovative method not only for software apps
but for other projects. By allowing the flexibility to reply to alteration at
the time of the development cycle, agile grants teams to ship better quality
products which fetch customers’ requirements. Agile helps in empowering teams,
developing accountability, and inspires innovation at the time of continuous
growth. Agile provides you the capability to answer the alteration without
going off the tracks. And that’s greatly helpful for any program.